The teaching cycle gains its motivation question. The teach quiz schema now carries a REQUIRED type field — predict (posed before the teaching, arrives open, the learner predicts the next step) or check (posed after, arrives collapsed behind the reveal). The prober's quiz stays role-less. - core: quizInputObject.type union + normalizeQuizType + the reveal law as pure quizNeedsReveal; QuestionData.questionType; note → thinking rename (legacy reads fold back); readingThinking channel on answers; compactAnswerForModel emits thinking / thinkingWhileReading - tools: descriptions stripped to mechanics — QUIZ_OPTION_CRAFT and EXPLAIN_DOCTRINE deleted, doctrine moved to the prompt layer (reverses the 2026-09-27 placement, owner 2026-10-03); shared quizDescription/explainDescription builders differ only in deltas - prompts: shared/20-question-tools.md rewritten (option craft, transcribed-speech leniency, the two thinking channels); new teacher/28-predictions.md (cycle, roles, skip rule, resolution law); 20-teaching + 30-question-principles scoped to the new taxonomy - UI: predictions render open with a Prediction eyebrow, verdict shows but the explanation tucks behind a toggle; the reading-thinking field mounts while a check waits (dictation claims it until reveal); answered card separates thinking vs thinking-while-reading blocks
1090 lines
46 KiB
TypeScript
1090 lines
46 KiB
TypeScript
/**
|
|
* Graph merger + trigger + derivation tests (vision §1, 2026-09-02 redesign;
|
|
* events cleanup 2026-09-27).
|
|
* The merger (core/graph.ts mergeFindings) is the pipeline's deterministic
|
|
* apply stage: AUDITED VERDICTS in, ledger appends out — link-or-create
|
|
* identity (the auditor's linkTo, never string matching) and the
|
|
* idempotency guarantees. No events ledger: quiz outcomes and
|
|
* understanding observations are no longer formalized in the graph.
|
|
*
|
|
* Ledger isolation: PATHS is fixed at import time, so the five data/graph
|
|
* ledgers are backed up and cleared before the suite and restored after
|
|
* (try/finally-shaped: the after() hook always runs, even on failure).
|
|
* The chat fixtures are real ChatRecords in the chat store (created and
|
|
* deleted by this suite) — the merger reads exactly what production reads.
|
|
* The full LLM pipeline (extractor → auditor) is tested in
|
|
* tests/extraction.test.ts with mock models.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
import assert from "node:assert/strict";
|
|
import * as fs from "node:fs";
|
|
import { after, describe, it } from "node:test";
|
|
import type { AuditVerdicts, GraphChain, GraphNode, SessionFindings } from "../src/core/contracts.ts";
|
|
import type { QuestionAnswerData } from "../src/core/question-core.ts";
|
|
import type { LhMessage } from "../src/core/native-messages.ts";
|
|
import { projectView as projectNative } from "../src/core/view.ts";
|
|
import { deriveView, getGraph, graphSnapshot, mergeFindings, type GraphDeps } from "../src/core/graph.ts";
|
|
import { coverageSlots } from "../src/core/coverage.ts";
|
|
import { graphStore } from "../src/store/graph.ts";
|
|
import { chatStore } from "../src/store/chats.ts";
|
|
import { LEDGER_FILES, PATHS, SOURCES_FILE } from "../config.ts";
|
|
|
|
/** The wired fs adapters, exactly what src/server/stores.ts passes in production. */
|
|
const graphDeps = { chatStore, graphStore } as const satisfies GraphDeps;
|
|
|
|
/** The session merge source for a chat — what the pipeline passes: the
|
|
* fold stamp only (the merger reads no transcript; quiz-event rebuilding
|
|
* died with the events ledger, 2026-09-27). */
|
|
function sessionSource(chatId: string): { foldedAt: string } {
|
|
const record = chatStore.getChat(chatId)!;
|
|
return { foldedAt: record.updatedAt };
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// ─── ledger isolation (backup-and-clear of data/graph/*.jsonl) ──────────────
|
|
|
|
const LEDGER_PATHS = [...Object.values(LEDGER_FILES), SOURCES_FILE];
|
|
const backups: Array<{ file: string; bak: string }> = [];
|
|
const createdChats: string[] = [];
|
|
|
|
fs.mkdirSync(PATHS.graph, { recursive: true });
|
|
for (const file of LEDGER_PATHS) {
|
|
if (fs.existsSync(file)) {
|
|
const bak = `${file}.w5test.bak`;
|
|
fs.renameSync(file, bak);
|
|
backups.push({ file, bak });
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
after(() => {
|
|
for (const file of LEDGER_PATHS) {
|
|
try {
|
|
fs.unlinkSync(file);
|
|
} catch {
|
|
/* nothing was written here */
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
for (const { file, bak } of backups) fs.renameSync(bak, file);
|
|
for (const id of createdChats) {
|
|
try {
|
|
fs.unlinkSync(`${PATHS.chats}/${id}.json`);
|
|
} catch {
|
|
/* already gone */
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ─── fixture builders ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
|
|
|
// Native fixture builders (Wave B): the record holds pi-native history —
|
|
// an assistant message carrying tool calls + one tool result per call. The
|
|
// projection reproduces the old part shapes (state output-available, input
|
|
// = arguments, output = result details).
|
|
interface NativeCall {
|
|
name: string;
|
|
toolCallId: string;
|
|
input: Record<string, unknown>;
|
|
output: QuestionAnswerData;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function user(id: string, text: string): LhMessage[] {
|
|
return [{ id, role: "user", content: text, timestamp: Date.now() } as never];
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** A teacher-prose message (the coverage unit, owner 2026-09-28). */
|
|
function teacher(id: string, text: string): LhMessage[] {
|
|
return [{ id, role: "assistant", content: [{ type: "text", text }], timestamp: Date.now() } as never];
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function assistant(id: string, calls: NativeCall[]): LhMessage[] {
|
|
const content = calls.map((c) => ({ type: "toolCall", id: c.toolCallId, name: c.name, arguments: c.input as never }));
|
|
const out: LhMessage[] = [
|
|
{
|
|
id,
|
|
role: "assistant",
|
|
content,
|
|
api: "openai-completions",
|
|
provider: "openrouter",
|
|
model: "test",
|
|
usage: { input: 0, output: 0, cacheRead: 0, cacheWrite: 0 },
|
|
stopReason: "stop",
|
|
timestamp: Date.now(),
|
|
} as never,
|
|
];
|
|
for (const c of calls) {
|
|
out.push({
|
|
id: `r_${c.toolCallId}`,
|
|
role: "toolResult",
|
|
toolCallId: c.toolCallId,
|
|
toolName: c.name,
|
|
content: [{ type: "text", text: "ok" }],
|
|
details: c.output,
|
|
isError: false,
|
|
timestamp: Date.now(),
|
|
} as never);
|
|
}
|
|
return out;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function quizPart(
|
|
toolCallId: string,
|
|
input: Record<string, unknown>,
|
|
output: QuestionAnswerData,
|
|
): NativeCall {
|
|
return { name: "quiz", toolCallId, input, output };
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function askPart(
|
|
toolCallId: string,
|
|
input: Record<string, unknown>,
|
|
output: QuestionAnswerData,
|
|
): NativeCall {
|
|
return { name: "ask_user_question", toolCallId, input, output };
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function answer(over: Partial<QuestionAnswerData>): QuestionAnswerData {
|
|
return {
|
|
kind: "quiz",
|
|
questionText: "question text",
|
|
dontKnow: false,
|
|
answers: [],
|
|
answeredAt: "2026-08-22T00:00:00.000Z",
|
|
...over,
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** Create a chat in the real store with messages; returns the record.
|
|
* Tree-blind world: the plan tree is irrelevant to the merger — no tree. */
|
|
function fixtureChat(title: string, messages: LhMessage[]) {
|
|
const chat = chatStore.createChat(title);
|
|
createdChats.push(chat.id);
|
|
chatStore.saveMessages(chat.id, messages);
|
|
return chatStore.getChat(chat.id)!;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** The full fixture transcript: five graded quizzes + a dismissed one + an ask. */
|
|
function fixtureMessages(): LhMessage[] {
|
|
return [
|
|
user("u1", "teach me the fixture topic"),
|
|
assistant("a1", [
|
|
quizPart(
|
|
"call-1",
|
|
{ question: "Q1", options: [{ label: "a" }, { label: "b" }], correctAnswer: "a", explanation: "e" },
|
|
answer({ questionText: "Q1 text", correct: false, answeredAt: "2026-08-22T01:00:00.000Z" }),
|
|
),
|
|
]),
|
|
assistant("a2", [
|
|
quizPart(
|
|
"call-2",
|
|
{ question: "Q2", options: [{ label: "a" }, { label: "b" }], correctAnswer: "a", explanation: "e" },
|
|
answer({ questionText: "Q2 text", dontKnow: true, correct: false, answeredAt: "2026-08-22T01:01:00.000Z" }),
|
|
),
|
|
]),
|
|
assistant("a3", [
|
|
// input.nodeId "alpha" is deliberately present and IGNORED —
|
|
// attribution is the only quiz→node path in the tree-blind world.
|
|
quizPart(
|
|
"call-3",
|
|
{ question: "Q3", nodeId: "alpha", options: [{ label: "a" }, { label: "b" }], correctAnswer: "a", explanation: "e" },
|
|
answer({ questionText: "Q3 text", correct: true, thinking: "recalled the diagram", answeredAt: "2026-08-22T02:00:00.000Z" }),
|
|
),
|
|
]),
|
|
assistant("a4", [
|
|
quizPart(
|
|
"call-4",
|
|
{ question: "Q4", options: [{ label: "a" }, { label: "b" }], correctAnswer: "a", explanation: "e" },
|
|
answer({ questionText: "Q4 text", correct: false, answeredAt: "2026-08-22T02:01:00.000Z" }),
|
|
),
|
|
]),
|
|
assistant("a5", [
|
|
quizPart(
|
|
"call-5",
|
|
{ question: "Q5", options: [{ label: "a" }, { label: "b" }], correctAnswer: "a", explanation: "e" },
|
|
answer({ questionText: "Q5 text", dontKnow: true, correct: false, answeredAt: "2026-08-22T02:02:00.000Z" }),
|
|
),
|
|
]),
|
|
assistant("a6", [
|
|
// dismissed quiz + an answered ask — neither becomes an event
|
|
quizPart(
|
|
"call-6",
|
|
{ question: "Q6", options: [{ label: "a" }, { label: "b" }], correctAnswer: "a", explanation: "e" },
|
|
answer({ questionText: "Q6 text", dismissed: true }),
|
|
),
|
|
askPart(
|
|
"call-7",
|
|
{ question: "free text?" },
|
|
answer({ kind: "ask", questionText: "free text?", text: "because" }),
|
|
),
|
|
]),
|
|
].flat();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** The extractor's findings for the fixture chat: three propositions,
|
|
* one follows edge (the graph starts empty — no links). */
|
|
function fixtureFindings(): SessionFindings {
|
|
return {
|
|
propositions: [
|
|
{
|
|
id: "p1",
|
|
name: "Alpha",
|
|
statement: "Alpha intuition",
|
|
aliases: ["alpha feel"],
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
id: "p2",
|
|
name: "Beta rule",
|
|
statement: "Beta rule",
|
|
aliases: [],
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
id: "p3",
|
|
name: "Gamma",
|
|
statement: "Gamma application",
|
|
aliases: [],
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
chains: [
|
|
{
|
|
premises: ["p1"],
|
|
conclusion: "p2",
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** The auditor's verdicts when nothing links: an empty verdict set is a
|
|
* valid full review (verdicts-only, owner 2026-09-28). */
|
|
function fixtureVerdicts(): AuditVerdicts {
|
|
return { links: [] };
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** The chat every merger test folds (shared, so ordering is intentional). */
|
|
const chat1 = fixtureChat("Graph fixture", fixtureMessages());
|
|
|
|
/** Set by the cross-session tests; the snapshot test (which runs after) reads them. */
|
|
let chat2Id = "";
|
|
let chat3Id = "";
|
|
|
|
// ─── the merger ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
|
|
|
/** Everything the graph holds for a set of chats (other processes' test
|
|
* emissions run concurrently against the same files — scope, never assume). */
|
|
function scopedGraph(chatIds: string[]) {
|
|
const graph = getGraph(graphStore);
|
|
return {
|
|
nodes: graph.nodes.filter((n) => n.provenance.some((pt) => chatIds.includes(pt.chatId))),
|
|
chains: graph.chains.filter((c) => c.provenance.some((pt) => chatIds.includes(pt.chatId))),
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
describe("the merger (mergeFindings)", () => {
|
|
it("creates nodes from the verdicts with chat-level provenance", () => {
|
|
const stats = mergeFindings(chat1.id, fixtureFindings(), fixtureVerdicts(), graphDeps, sessionSource(chat1.id));
|
|
assert.deepEqual(stats, { nodes: 3, chains: 1 });
|
|
|
|
const graph = scopedGraph([chat1.id]);
|
|
assert.equal(graph.nodes.length, 3);
|
|
const idByStatement = new Map(graph.nodes.map((n) => [n.statement, n.id]));
|
|
for (const node of graph.nodes) {
|
|
assert.match(node.id, /^n_/);
|
|
assert.ok(node.name.length > 0, "name is required");
|
|
assert.equal("kind" in node, false, "no kind field");
|
|
assert.ok(Array.isArray(node.provenance), "provenance attached");
|
|
}
|
|
// Provenance is CHAT-LEVEL (submit-schema slim, 2026-09-28):
|
|
// propositions no longer carry message ids — the run's source key
|
|
// is the whole provenance.
|
|
const alpha = graph.nodes.find((n) => n.statement === "Alpha intuition")!;
|
|
assert.deepEqual(alpha.provenance, [{ chatId: chat1.id, messageId: "" }]);
|
|
|
|
// The stored chain, provenance attached.
|
|
assert.equal(graph.chains.length, 1);
|
|
const chain = graph.chains[0]!;
|
|
assert.match(chain.id, /^arg_/, "store-minted argument id");
|
|
assert.deepEqual(chain.premises, [idByStatement.get("Alpha intuition")]);
|
|
assert.equal(chain.conclusion, idByStatement.get("Beta rule"));
|
|
assert.deepEqual(chain.provenance, [{ chatId: chat1.id, messageId: "" }]);
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("merges INDEPENDENTLY per call — no cross-run identity (owner, 2026-09-29)", () => {
|
|
// The mappings ledger is gone: resolution is a job-local in-memory
|
|
// map, so a second merge of the same verdicts knows nothing of the
|
|
// first. Cross-run identity is the AUDITOR's job (linkTo) plus the
|
|
// coverage ledger (nothing re-extracts) — never the merger's.
|
|
// (Own chat + unique statements — this suite stacks on shared
|
|
// files, so nothing here may touch the other tests' counts.)
|
|
const rep = fixtureChat("Independence fixture", [user("u1", "rep")].flat());
|
|
const findings: SessionFindings = {
|
|
propositions: [
|
|
{ id: "p1", name: "Rep one", statement: "Independence one statement", aliases: [] },
|
|
{ id: "p2", name: "Rep two", statement: "Independence two statement", aliases: [] },
|
|
],
|
|
chains: [{ premises: ["p1"], conclusion: "p2" }],
|
|
};
|
|
const first = mergeFindings(rep.id, findings, { links: [] }, graphDeps, sessionSource(rep.id));
|
|
assert.deepEqual(first, { nodes: 2, chains: 1 });
|
|
const second = mergeFindings(rep.id, findings, { links: [] }, graphDeps, sessionSource(rep.id));
|
|
assert.deepEqual(second, { nodes: 2, chains: 1 }, "nothing remembered — everything re-creates");
|
|
const graph = scopedGraph([rep.id]);
|
|
assert.equal(graph.nodes.length, 4, "the propositions merge again as fresh nodes");
|
|
assert.equal(graph.chains.length, 2, "fresh endpoints — fresh chain assertions");
|
|
// exactly one checkpoint line per merge, though — checkpoints are a log
|
|
assert.equal(graphStore.readCheckpoints().filter((c) => c.chatId === rep.id).length, 2);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("is idempotent WITHIN one submit — a repeated proposition id resolves once", () => {
|
|
const dup = fixtureChat("Duplicate-id fixture", [user("u1", "dup")].flat());
|
|
const findings: SessionFindings = {
|
|
propositions: [
|
|
{ id: "p1", name: "Dup", statement: "Dup statement", aliases: [] },
|
|
{ id: "p1", name: "Dup", statement: "Dup statement", aliases: [] },
|
|
],
|
|
chains: [],
|
|
};
|
|
const stats = mergeFindings(dup.id, findings, { links: [] }, graphDeps, sessionSource(dup.id));
|
|
assert.deepEqual(stats, { nodes: 1, chains: 0 }, "the duplicate id is skipped — first resolution stands");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("applies a linkTo verdict: phrasings join aliases, provenance unions, no duplicate node", () => {
|
|
const alphaId = scopedGraph([chat1.id]).nodes.find((n) => n.statement === "Alpha intuition")!.id;
|
|
const chat2 = fixtureChat("Graph fixture 2", [
|
|
user("u1", "again"),
|
|
assistant("a1", [
|
|
quizPart(
|
|
"call-9",
|
|
{ question: "Q9", options: [{ label: "a" }, { label: "b" }], correctAnswer: "a", explanation: "e" },
|
|
answer({ questionText: "Q9 text", correct: true, answeredAt: "2026-08-22T03:00:00.000Z" }),
|
|
),
|
|
]),
|
|
].flat());
|
|
chat2Id = chat2.id;
|
|
|
|
// The auditor's identity verdict: this proposition IS the alpha node.
|
|
const stats = mergeFindings(
|
|
chat2.id,
|
|
{
|
|
propositions: [
|
|
{
|
|
id: "q1",
|
|
name: "Alpha",
|
|
statement: "Alpha feel", // a DIFFERENT phrasing — identity is the verdict, not strings
|
|
aliases: ["alpha intuition"],
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
chains: [],
|
|
},
|
|
// VERDICTS-ONLY: the identity call is a link entry, not a field
|
|
// on the proposition (owner, 2026-09-28).
|
|
{ links: [{ id: "q1", linkTo: alphaId }] },
|
|
graphDeps,
|
|
sessionSource(chat2.id),
|
|
);
|
|
assert.deepEqual(stats, { nodes: 0, chains: 0 });
|
|
|
|
const after = scopedGraph([chat1.id, chat2.id]);
|
|
assert.equal(after.nodes.length, 3, "no duplicate node");
|
|
const alpha = getGraph(graphStore).nodes.find((n) => n.id === alphaId)!;
|
|
assert.ok(alpha.aliases.includes("Alpha feel"), "the session's phrasing joins the aliases");
|
|
assert.ok(alpha.aliases.includes("alpha intuition"));
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
alpha.provenance.some((pt) => pt.chatId === chat2.id),
|
|
"provenance unions",
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("resolves imported-notes ids to their file paths in the snapshot (static provenance)", () => {
|
|
// The notes front door in miniature: a source record + a merge under
|
|
// its src id — the snapshot must label it with the file path (a
|
|
// static entry), never as a chat session.
|
|
graphStore.upsertSource({ id: "src_snapfixture", filePath: "/vault/learn vim.md", importedAt: "2026-09-13T00:00:00.000Z" });
|
|
mergeFindings(
|
|
"src_snapfixture",
|
|
{
|
|
propositions: [
|
|
{
|
|
id: "p1",
|
|
name: "Vim registers",
|
|
statement: "Vim registers map single keys to editing commands.",
|
|
aliases: [],
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
chains: [],
|
|
},
|
|
{ links: [] },
|
|
graphDeps,
|
|
{ foldedAt: "2026-09-13T00:00:00.000Z" },
|
|
);
|
|
const snap = graphSnapshot(graphDeps);
|
|
const node = snap.nodes.find((n) => n.statement === "Vim registers map single keys to editing commands.")!;
|
|
assert.equal(snap.fileSources["src_snapfixture"], "/vault/learn vim.md");
|
|
assert.deepEqual(snap.nodeSessions[node.id], ["src_snapfixture"], "the file entry joins the node's sessions list");
|
|
assert.equal(snap.sessions["src_snapfixture"], undefined, "a notes source is never a chat session");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("derives BIRTH-SESSION clusters in graphSnapshot, labeled with the session's name", () => {
|
|
// Wave 7 (owner-locked 2026-09-23): embeddings are dead — a cluster is
|
|
// the session that BIRTHED its propositions, derived on read from
|
|
// provenance. No ledger partition to play, no LLM naming pass — the
|
|
// label IS the session's name (chat title / file path).
|
|
const tri = ["Alpha.", "Beta.", "Gamma cluster."] as const;
|
|
graphStore.upsertSource({ id: "src_clusterfixture", filePath: "/vault/cluster notes.md", importedAt: "2026-09-13T00:00:00.000Z" });
|
|
const merge = mergeFindings(
|
|
"src_clusterfixture",
|
|
{
|
|
propositions: tri.map((statement, i) => ({
|
|
id: `p${i + 1}`,
|
|
name: `Cluster node ${i + 1}`,
|
|
statement,
|
|
aliases: [],
|
|
})),
|
|
chains: [
|
|
{ premises: ["p1"], conclusion: "p2", },
|
|
{ premises: ["p2"], conclusion: "p3", },
|
|
],
|
|
},
|
|
{ links: [] },
|
|
graphDeps,
|
|
{ foldedAt: "2026-09-13T00:00:00.000Z" },
|
|
);
|
|
assert.equal(merge.nodes, 3);
|
|
const snap = graphSnapshot(graphDeps);
|
|
// Presentation threshold: every cluster is >= 3 members.
|
|
assert.ok(snap.clusters.every((c) => c.members.length >= 3));
|
|
// Our trio is exactly one cluster — the notes file that BIRTHED it,
|
|
// labeled with its path, id = the source id (stable, no content hash).
|
|
const mine = snap.clusters.find((c) => c.members.length === 3 && tri.every((s) => c.members.includes(snap.nodes.find((n) => n.statement === s)!.id)));
|
|
assert.ok(mine, "the trio is one cluster");
|
|
assert.equal(mine!.id, "src_clusterfixture");
|
|
assert.equal(mine!.label, "/vault/cluster notes.md", "a notes file is a birth-session — the label is its path");
|
|
|
|
// Chains-primary split (owner, 2026-09-30): `nodes` is the canvas
|
|
// image, `propositions` the stored truth alone (the chain table's
|
|
// input). The store is shared across this suite, so assert the
|
|
// INVARIANT, not counts — and since the rendering arc
|
|
// (2026-09-30), only MULTI-premise live chains mint imp nodes
|
|
// (this fixture's two single-premise chains collapse to direct
|
|
// arrows — zero imp nodes here).
|
|
const stored = graphStore.readChains();
|
|
const live = new Set(snap.propositions.map((n) => n.id));
|
|
const impChains = stored.filter(
|
|
(c) => c.premises.length >= 2 && live.has(c.conclusion) && c.premises.every((p) => live.has(p)),
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(snap.propositions.every((n) => !n.id.startsWith("arg_")), "the stored-truth list never carries imp nodes");
|
|
assert.equal(snap.nodes.length, snap.propositions.length + impChains.length, "image = truth + one imp node per MULTI-premise live chain");
|
|
const imp = snap.nodes.filter((n) => n.id.startsWith("arg_"));
|
|
assert.ok(imp.length === impChains.length && imp.every((n) => snap.propositions.every((p) => p.id !== n.id)), "the extra nodes are exactly the derived implication nodes");
|
|
assert.equal(imp.length, 0, "this fixture's chains are single-premise — all collapsed to direct arrows");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("derives the sessions index in graphSnapshot", () => {
|
|
const snap = graphSnapshot(graphDeps);
|
|
const idByStatement = new Map(snap.nodes.map((n) => [n.statement, n.id]));
|
|
// No node-state classes (2026-09-08) and no understanding
|
|
// observations (2026-09-27 cleanup): the snapshot carries only the
|
|
// objective graph + sessions.
|
|
assert.equal("nodeStates" in snap, false);
|
|
assert.equal("nodeObservations" in snap, false);
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(snap.sessions[chat1.id], "Graph fixture");
|
|
assert.equal(snap.sessions[chat2Id], "Graph fixture 2");
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
(snap.nodeSessions[idByStatement.get("Alpha intuition")!] ?? []).sort(),
|
|
[chat1.id, chat2Id].sort(),
|
|
);
|
|
// Gamma was only ever touched by chat1.
|
|
assert.deepEqual(snap.nodeSessions[idByStatement.get("Gamma application")!], [chat1.id]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("never string-matches without a verdict — an identical statement without linkTo is a NEW node", () => {
|
|
const chat3 = fixtureChat("Graph fixture 3", [user("u1", "third")].flat());
|
|
chat3Id = chat3.id;
|
|
const stats = mergeFindings(
|
|
chat3.id,
|
|
{
|
|
propositions: [
|
|
{
|
|
id: "r1",
|
|
name: "Alpha",
|
|
statement: "Alpha intuition", // IDENTICAL to the existing node's statement
|
|
aliases: [],
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
chains: [],
|
|
},
|
|
// empty verdicts — identity is the auditor's call alone
|
|
{ links: [] },
|
|
graphDeps,
|
|
sessionSource(chat3.id),
|
|
);
|
|
assert.equal(stats.nodes, 1, "created — the merger does not match strings");
|
|
assert.equal(getGraph(graphStore).nodes.filter((n) => n.statement === "Alpha intuition").length, 2);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("merges the notes front door: source id as chatId, checkpoint at import time", () => {
|
|
// Raw personal notes carry no transcript — no message anchors; the
|
|
// file is the provenance (and no events exist to build, 2026-09-27).
|
|
const stats = mergeFindings(
|
|
"src_notesfixture",
|
|
{
|
|
propositions: [
|
|
{
|
|
id: "p1",
|
|
name: "Vim normal mode",
|
|
statement: "Vim starts in Normal mode, where keys are commands.",
|
|
aliases: [],
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
chains: [],
|
|
},
|
|
{ links: [] },
|
|
graphDeps,
|
|
{ foldedAt: "2026-09-13T00:00:00.000Z" },
|
|
);
|
|
assert.deepEqual(stats, { nodes: 1, chains: 0 });
|
|
|
|
const node = getGraph(graphStore).nodes.find((n) => n.statement.startsWith("Vim starts"))!;
|
|
assert.deepEqual(node.provenance, [{ chatId: "src_notesfixture", messageId: "" }], "one chat-level point — the source key, no message anchors");
|
|
// The checkpoint stamps the import time.
|
|
assert.equal(graphStore.readCheckpoints().find((c) => c.chatId === "src_notesfixture")?.foldedAt, "2026-09-13T00:00:00.000Z");
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
// ─── store primitives ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
|
|
|
describe("graph ledger store", () => {
|
|
it("round-trips lines and skips corrupt / foreign-shaped lines (strict reads)", () => {
|
|
const node = {
|
|
id: "n_storetest",
|
|
name: "Store test",
|
|
statement: "Store test, elaborated.",
|
|
aliases: [] as string[],
|
|
createdAt: "2026-08-22T00:00:00.000Z",
|
|
provenance: [{ chatId: "chat_c", messageId: "m1" }],
|
|
};
|
|
graphStore.appendNode(node);
|
|
// A torn append and a pre-name-pivot node (old schema: description, no
|
|
// name) — both skipped by the strict guard.
|
|
fs.appendFileSync(
|
|
LEDGER_FILES.nodes,
|
|
`{not json}\n${JSON.stringify({ id: "legacy", statement: "Legacy shape", description: "Old schema.", aliases: [], createdAt: "2026-08-22T00:00:00.000Z", provenance: [] })}\n`,
|
|
"utf-8",
|
|
);
|
|
const nodes = graphStore.readNodes().filter((n) => n.id === "n_storetest" || n.id === "legacy");
|
|
assert.equal(nodes.length, 1);
|
|
assert.equal(nodes[0]!.name, "Store test");
|
|
assert.equal(nodes[0]!.statement, "Store test, elaborated.");
|
|
assert.deepEqual(nodes[0]!.provenance, [{ chatId: "chat_c", messageId: "m1" }]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
it("returns RAW node lines — repeated ids (link-appends) are each their own line; getGraph merges", () => {
|
|
const line = (msgId: string) =>
|
|
JSON.stringify({
|
|
id: "n_linktest",
|
|
name: "Link test",
|
|
statement: `Phrasing ${msgId}`,
|
|
aliases: [],
|
|
createdAt: "2026-08-22T00:00:00.000Z",
|
|
provenance: [{ chatId: "chat_c", messageId: msgId }],
|
|
});
|
|
fs.appendFileSync(LEDGER_FILES.nodes, `${line("m1")}\n${line("m2")}\n`, "utf-8");
|
|
const lines = graphStore.readNodes().filter((n) => n.id === "n_linktest");
|
|
assert.equal(lines.length, 2, "the store returns raw lines, one per append");
|
|
const merged = getGraph(graphStore).nodes.find((n) => n.id === "n_linktest")!;
|
|
assert.equal(merged.statement, "Phrasing m1", "the FIRST line defines the node");
|
|
assert.ok(merged.aliases.includes("Phrasing m2"), "later phrasings join the aliases");
|
|
assert.deepEqual(merged.provenance.map((p) => p.messageId), ["m1", "m2"]);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ─── session deletion (wave 6 — the first destructive ledger operation) ─────
|
|
|
|
import { deleteChatTraces, type ChatDeletionStats } from "../src/core/graph-deletion.ts";
|
|
import { deleteChatSession, sessionCoverage } from "../src/server/chats.ts";
|
|
import { beginTurn, endTurn } from "../src/server/turn-liveness.ts";
|
|
import { jobStore } from "../src/store/jobs.ts";
|
|
import {
|
|
deleteNodeTraces,
|
|
type NodeDeletionStats,
|
|
} from "../src/core/graph-deletion.ts";
|
|
import { deleteGraphNode, graphRevision } from "../src/server/graph.ts";
|
|
|
|
describe("session deletion (deleteChatTraces + deleteChatSession, wave 6)", () => {
|
|
/** Two-session scenario: dA creates the shared node X + the orphan Y and
|
|
* asserts X→Y; dB links X (its own phrasings), creates Z, asserts X→Z.
|
|
* Deleting dA must: keep X (dB's link line survives, dA's create-line
|
|
* aliases stripped — the identity stays), kill Y (orphan), keep Z and
|
|
* dB's edge, kill dA's coverage/checkpoints. */
|
|
function buildTwoSessionScenario() {
|
|
const dA = fixtureChat("Deletion session A", [
|
|
user("du1", "teach me the deletion topic"),
|
|
assistant("da1", [
|
|
quizPart(
|
|
"d-call-1",
|
|
{ question: "DQ1", options: [{ label: "a" }, { label: "b" }], correctAnswer: "a", explanation: "e" },
|
|
answer({ questionText: "DQ1 text", correct: true, answeredAt: "2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z" }),
|
|
),
|
|
]),
|
|
].flat());
|
|
const findingsA: SessionFindings = {
|
|
propositions: [
|
|
{ id: "p1", name: "Shared core", statement: "Shared core statement", aliases: ["shared feel"], },
|
|
{ id: "p2", name: "Solo fact", statement: "Solo fact statement", aliases: ["solo feel"], },
|
|
],
|
|
chains: [{ premises: ["p1"], conclusion: "p2", }],
|
|
};
|
|
mergeFindings(dA.id, findingsA, { links: [] }, graphDeps, sessionSource(dA.id));
|
|
// Resolve through THIS session's provenance — the shared ledger
|
|
// holds lookalike statements from earlier tests, so scope by chat.
|
|
const bornOf = (chatId: string, statement: string): string =>
|
|
getGraph(graphStore).nodes.find((n) => n.statement === statement && n.provenance.some((pt) => pt.chatId === chatId))!.id;
|
|
const xId = bornOf(dA.id, "Shared core statement");
|
|
const yId = bornOf(dA.id, "Solo fact statement");
|
|
|
|
const dB = fixtureChat("Deletion session B", [
|
|
user("eu1", "more on the shared core"),
|
|
assistant("eb1", [
|
|
quizPart(
|
|
"e-call-1",
|
|
{ question: "EQ1", options: [{ label: "a" }, { label: "b" }], correctAnswer: "a", explanation: "e" },
|
|
answer({ questionText: "EQ1 text", correct: false, answeredAt: "2026-09-23T00:01:00.000Z" }),
|
|
),
|
|
]),
|
|
].flat());
|
|
const findingsB: SessionFindings = {
|
|
propositions: [
|
|
{ id: "q1", name: "Shared again", statement: "Shared core, rephrased", aliases: ["B phrasing"] },
|
|
{ id: "q2", name: "B extra", statement: "B extra statement", aliases: ["b extra feel"], },
|
|
],
|
|
chains: [{ premises: ["q1"], conclusion: "q2", }],
|
|
};
|
|
mergeFindings(dB.id, findingsB, { links: [{ id: "q1", linkTo: xId }] }, graphDeps, sessionSource(dB.id));
|
|
const zId = bornOf(dB.id, "B extra statement");
|
|
|
|
// Coverage rows (both chats) + positions garnish — the deletion
|
|
// prunes both ledgers.
|
|
for (const chat of [dA, dB]) {
|
|
for (let i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
|
|
graphStore.appendCoverage({ chatId: chat.id, fp: `${chat.id}-${i}`, tokens: 10, foldedAt: "2026-09-23T00:02:00.000Z" });
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
graphStore.writePositions({ ...graphStore.readPositions(), [xId]: { x: 1, y: 1 }, [yId]: { x: 2, y: 2 }, [zId]: { x: 3, y: 3 } });
|
|
return { dA, dB, xId, yId, zId };
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
it("delete-nodes: the shared node survives with the other session's content; the orphan dies; the creator's aliases are stripped (owner ruling 2026-09-23)", () => {
|
|
const { dA, dB, xId, yId, zId } = buildTwoSessionScenario();
|
|
const zLineBefore = JSON.stringify(graphStore.readNodes().find((n) => n.id === zId));
|
|
|
|
const stats = deleteChatTraces(graphStore, dA.id, "delete-nodes");
|
|
assert.deepEqual(stats, {
|
|
nodesRemoved: 1,
|
|
chainsRemoved: 1,
|
|
coverageRemoved: 2,
|
|
checkpointsRemoved: 1,
|
|
} satisfies ChatDeletionStats);
|
|
|
|
const graph = getGraph(graphStore);
|
|
// X survives: identity (name/statement/createdAt from the create
|
|
// line) intact, dA's aliases + provenance gone, dB's phrasings in.
|
|
const x = graph.nodes.find((n) => n.id === xId)!;
|
|
assert.equal(x.statement, "Shared core statement", "the shared identity survives");
|
|
assert.equal(x.name, "Shared core");
|
|
assert.ok(!x.aliases.includes("shared feel"), "the deleted creator's phrasings are stripped (owner ruling)");
|
|
assert.ok(x.aliases.includes("B phrasing") && x.aliases.includes("Shared core, rephrased"));
|
|
assert.deepEqual(x.provenance, [{ chatId: dB.id, messageId: "" }], "only dB's provenance remains");
|
|
// Y (the orphan) is gone entirely.
|
|
assert.equal(graph.nodes.some((n) => n.id === yId), false);
|
|
assert.equal(graphStore.readNodes().some((n) => n.id === yId), false);
|
|
// Z (dB-only) is untouched, byte-identical.
|
|
assert.equal(JSON.stringify(graphStore.readNodes().find((n) => n.id === zId)), zLineBefore);
|
|
// Chains: dA's argument X⇒Y died (Y died); dB's X⇒Z survived.
|
|
const scoped = scopedGraph([dA.id, dB.id]);
|
|
assert.equal(scoped.chains.length, 1);
|
|
assert.deepEqual(scoped.chains[0]!.premises, [xId]);
|
|
assert.equal(scoped.chains[0]!.conclusion, zId);
|
|
assert.deepEqual(scoped.chains[0]!.provenance, [{ chatId: dB.id, messageId: "" }]);
|
|
// Positions: the orphan pruned.
|
|
const positions = graphStore.readPositions();
|
|
assert.equal(positions[yId], undefined);
|
|
assert.deepEqual(positions[xId], { x: 1, y: 1 });
|
|
// The snapshot resolves X to dB only — the deleted chat left no ghost.
|
|
const snapshot = graphSnapshot(graphDeps);
|
|
assert.deepEqual(snapshot.nodeSessions[xId], [dB.id]);
|
|
assert.ok(snapshot.sessions[dB.id] && !snapshot.sessions[dA.id]);
|
|
// Atomic rewrites left no temp files, and appends still work.
|
|
assert.equal(fs.readdirSync(PATHS.graph).filter((f) => f.includes(".tmp-")).length, 0);
|
|
const nodesBefore = graphStore.readNodes().length;
|
|
// Foreign provenance: the probe is another chat's data, so later
|
|
// deletions must leave it untouched (the foreign-data doctrine).
|
|
graphStore.appendNode({ id: "n_del_append_probe", name: "Probe", statement: "Probe statement", aliases: [], createdAt: "2026-09-23T00:04:00.000Z", provenance: [{ chatId: "chat_foreign_probe", messageId: "" }] });
|
|
assert.equal(graphStore.readNodes().length, nodesBefore + 1);
|
|
// Idempotent: a second run finds nothing.
|
|
assert.deepEqual(deleteChatTraces(graphStore, dA.id, "delete-nodes"), { ...stats, nodesRemoved: 0, chainsRemoved: 0, coverageRemoved: 0, checkpointsRemoved: 0 } satisfies ChatDeletionStats);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("preserve-graph: only the extraction bookkeeping dies — the graph ledgers are byte-identical", () => {
|
|
const { dA, dB, xId, yId, zId } = buildTwoSessionScenario();
|
|
const before = {
|
|
nodes: graphStore.readNodes(),
|
|
chains: graphStore.readChains(),
|
|
positions: graphStore.readPositions(),
|
|
};
|
|
const stats = deleteChatTraces(graphStore, dA.id, "preserve-graph");
|
|
assert.deepEqual(stats, {
|
|
nodesRemoved: 0,
|
|
chainsRemoved: 0,
|
|
coverageRemoved: 2,
|
|
checkpointsRemoved: 1,
|
|
} satisfies ChatDeletionStats);
|
|
assert.deepEqual(graphStore.readNodes(), before.nodes);
|
|
assert.deepEqual(graphStore.readChains(), before.chains);
|
|
assert.deepEqual(graphStore.readPositions(), before.positions);
|
|
assert.equal(graphStore.readCoverage().some((row) => row.chatId === dA.id), false);
|
|
assert.equal(graphStore.readCoverage().some((row) => row.chatId === dB.id), true);
|
|
void xId; void yId; void zId;
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("deleteChatSession: the orchestration's gates and the sync block", async () => {
|
|
// 404 — unknown chat.
|
|
assert.deepEqual(await deleteChatSession("chat_missing_delete", "delete-nodes"), { ok: false, status: 404, code: "not_found", error: "No such session" });
|
|
|
|
const { dA } = buildTwoSessionScenario();
|
|
// 409 — a turn in flight.
|
|
beginTurn(dA.id);
|
|
const turnedAway = await deleteChatSession(dA.id, "delete-nodes");
|
|
assert.deepEqual(turnedAway, { ok: false, status: 409, code: "turn_in_flight", error: "A turn is running in this session — try again when it finishes", jobIds: [] });
|
|
endTurn(dA.id);
|
|
// 409 — running background jobs.
|
|
const job = jobStore.createJob({ kind: "research", chatId: dA.id, toolCallId: "del-call-1" });
|
|
const jobsBlocked = await deleteChatSession(dA.id, "delete-nodes");
|
|
assert.ok(!jobsBlocked.ok && jobsBlocked.status === 409, "refused with 409");
|
|
if (jobsBlocked.code === "jobs_running") assert.deepEqual(jobsBlocked.jobIds, [job.id]);
|
|
assert.equal(jobStore.deleteJobsForChat(dA.id), 1, "test cleanup — the job file is gone");
|
|
|
|
// Success — a terminal job rides along; the chat record dies last.
|
|
const doneJob = jobStore.createJob({ kind: "research", chatId: dA.id, toolCallId: "del-call-2" });
|
|
jobStore.updateJob(doneJob.id, { status: "done", activity: "delivered" });
|
|
const outcome = await deleteChatSession(dA.id, "delete-nodes");
|
|
assert.equal(outcome.ok, true);
|
|
if (outcome.ok) {
|
|
assert.equal(outcome.mode, "delete-nodes");
|
|
assert.equal(outcome.stats.nodesRemoved, 1);
|
|
assert.equal(outcome.jobsRemoved, 1);
|
|
assert.ok(outcome.graphRevision > 0, "the version stamp moved");
|
|
}
|
|
assert.equal(chatStore.getChat(dA.id), null, "the chat record is gone");
|
|
assert.equal(jobStore.getJob(doneJob.id), null, "the chat's job records are gone");
|
|
// And a second call is an honest 404.
|
|
assert.deepEqual(await deleteChatSession(dA.id, "delete-nodes"), { ok: false, status: 404, code: "not_found", error: "No such session" });
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ─── single-node deletion (node interlude, full death) ───────────────────────
|
|
|
|
describe("single-node deletion (deleteNodeTraces + deleteGraphNode, node interlude)", () => {
|
|
/** The full-death scenario: node X is born in a notes file (EMPTY
|
|
* provenance — a legacy line; the mappings anchor is gone, owner
|
|
* 2026-09-29), re-encountered by a chat (link line: alias +
|
|
* provenance), and asserted in chains by two sessions. */
|
|
function buildNodeScenario() {
|
|
// Clean slate per test: each test in this describe builds its own
|
|
// scenario from empty ledgers (the suite's isolation covers the
|
|
// whole file; this covers describe-internal stacking).
|
|
graphStore.rewriteLedgers({ nodes: [], chains: [] });
|
|
graphStore.writePositions({});
|
|
graphStore.appendNode({
|
|
id: "n_dead",
|
|
name: "Doomed",
|
|
statement: "Doomed statement",
|
|
aliases: [],
|
|
createdAt: "2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z",
|
|
provenance: [],
|
|
});
|
|
// The chat's re-encounter: a link line (alias + its own provenance).
|
|
graphStore.appendNode({
|
|
id: "n_dead",
|
|
name: "Doomed",
|
|
statement: "Doomed statement",
|
|
aliases: ["doomed, rephrased"],
|
|
createdAt: "2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z",
|
|
provenance: [{ chatId: "chat_node_a", messageId: "m1" }],
|
|
});
|
|
// A neighbor + two edges: only the one touching X dies.
|
|
graphStore.appendNode({
|
|
id: "n_keep",
|
|
name: "Keeper",
|
|
statement: "Keeper statement",
|
|
aliases: [],
|
|
createdAt: "2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z",
|
|
provenance: [{ chatId: "chat_node_a", messageId: "m2" }],
|
|
});
|
|
graphStore.appendChain({ id: "arg_dead_keep", premises: ["n_dead"], conclusion: "n_keep", createdAt: "2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z", provenance: [{ chatId: "chat_node_a", messageId: "m1" }] });
|
|
graphStore.appendChain({ id: "arg_keep_dead", premises: ["n_keep"], conclusion: "n_dead", createdAt: "2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z", provenance: [{ chatId: "chat_node_b", messageId: "m3" }] });
|
|
// A FOREIGN chain the deletion must not touch (destructive rewriting
|
|
// may not exceed the blast radius — foreign data rides untouched).
|
|
graphStore.appendChain({ id: "arg_keep_other", premises: ["n_keep"], conclusion: "n_other", createdAt: "2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z", provenance: [{ chatId: "chat_node_b", messageId: "m3" }] });
|
|
// Resting positions for both nodes and both dying chains' imp nodes.
|
|
graphStore.writePositions({ n_dead: { x: 1, y: 1 }, n_keep: { x: 2, y: 2 }, arg_dead_keep: { x: 1.5, y: 1.5 }, arg_keep_dead: { x: 2.5, y: 2.5 } });
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
it("deleteNodeTraces: FULL DEATH — the node, its edges, its evidence, its anchors, its position", () => {
|
|
buildNodeScenario();
|
|
const keepLineBefore = JSON.stringify(graphStore.readNodes().find((n) => n.id === "n_keep"));
|
|
const stats = deleteNodeTraces(graphStore, "n_dead");
|
|
assert.deepEqual(stats, { chainsRemoved: 2 } satisfies NodeDeletionStats);
|
|
|
|
// The node's EVERY line is gone; the neighbor is byte-identical
|
|
// (full death is node-scoped — other nodes' sessions keep their
|
|
// aliases and provenance).
|
|
assert.equal(graphStore.readNodes().some((n) => n.id === "n_dead"), false);
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
JSON.stringify(graphStore.readNodes().find((n) => n.id === "n_keep")),
|
|
keepLineBefore,
|
|
"the untouched node is byte-identical",
|
|
);
|
|
// Only the chains referencing X died; the foreign chain stays.
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
graphStore.readChains().map((c) => [c.premises, c.conclusion]),
|
|
[[["n_keep"], "n_other"]],
|
|
);
|
|
// The resting position died with the node.
|
|
const positions = graphStore.readPositions();
|
|
assert.equal(positions["n_dead"], undefined);
|
|
assert.deepEqual(positions["n_keep"], { x: 2, y: 2 });
|
|
assert.equal(positions["arg_dead_keep"], undefined, "the dying chains' imp-node positions die too");
|
|
assert.equal(positions["arg_keep_dead"], undefined);
|
|
// Atomic rewrites left no temp files.
|
|
assert.equal(fs.readdirSync(PATHS.graph).filter((f) => f.includes(".tmp-")).length, 0);
|
|
// Idempotent: a second run finds no node — null.
|
|
assert.equal(deleteNodeTraces(graphStore, "n_dead"), null);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("deleteNodeTraces: a node nothing references still dies, and only its file moves", () => {
|
|
graphStore.appendNode({
|
|
id: "n_solo",
|
|
name: "Solo",
|
|
statement: "Solo statement",
|
|
aliases: [],
|
|
createdAt: "2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z",
|
|
provenance: [{ chatId: "chat_node_solo", messageId: "m1" }],
|
|
});
|
|
const stats = deleteNodeTraces(graphStore, "n_solo");
|
|
assert.deepEqual(stats, { chainsRemoved: 0 } satisfies NodeDeletionStats);
|
|
assert.equal(graphStore.readNodes().some((n) => n.id === "n_solo"), false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("deleteGraphNode: the orchestration — extraction gate, 404, success", () => {
|
|
// 404 — unknown node.
|
|
assert.deepEqual(deleteGraphNode("n_missing_node"), {
|
|
ok: false,
|
|
status: 404,
|
|
code: "not_found",
|
|
error: "No such node",
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// 409 — ANY registered extraction run: a mid-flight run could
|
|
// re-reference the dying node; the run is never aborted (its spend
|
|
// belongs to another session), the caller retries. The registry is
|
|
// the pipeline's globalThis store — a fake entry is the honest way
|
|
// to pin the gate without staging a real run.
|
|
const g = globalThis as { __lhExtractionRuns?: unknown };
|
|
const realRuns = g.__lhExtractionRuns;
|
|
g.__lhExtractionRuns = {
|
|
running: new Map([
|
|
["chat_busy", { chatId: "chat_busy", kind: "chat", phase: "extracting", startedAt: 1, usage: {}, controller: new AbortController() }],
|
|
]),
|
|
inFlight: new Set(),
|
|
lastStartedAt: 0,
|
|
};
|
|
try {
|
|
assert.deepEqual(deleteGraphNode("n_gate_probe"), {
|
|
ok: false,
|
|
status: 409,
|
|
code: "extraction_running",
|
|
error: "An extraction is running — try again when it finishes",
|
|
});
|
|
} finally {
|
|
g.__lhExtractionRuns = realRuns;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Success — the node dies, the version stamp moves.
|
|
graphStore.appendNode({
|
|
id: "n_orch",
|
|
name: "Orchestrated",
|
|
statement: "Orchestrated statement",
|
|
aliases: [],
|
|
createdAt: "2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z",
|
|
provenance: [{ chatId: "chat_node_c", messageId: "m1" }],
|
|
});
|
|
const revisionBefore = graphRevision();
|
|
const outcome = deleteGraphNode("n_orch");
|
|
assert.ok(outcome.ok);
|
|
assert.deepEqual(outcome.stats, { chainsRemoved: 0 });
|
|
assert.ok(outcome.graphRevision > 0);
|
|
assert.ok(outcome.graphRevision >= revisionBefore, "the version stamp moved");
|
|
assert.equal(graphStore.readNodes().some((n) => n.id === "n_orch"), false);
|
|
// And a second call is an honest 404.
|
|
assert.deepEqual(deleteGraphNode("n_orch"), { ok: false, status: 404, code: "not_found", error: "No such node" });
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe("session coverage read (extraction-UX redesign, 2026-09-24)", () => {
|
|
it("one session's block: derived uncovered, the newest fold, honest nulls", () => {
|
|
// Empty coverage: everything uncovered, no fold yet, not running.
|
|
// Teacher prose only (owner, 2026-09-28): coverage slots are the
|
|
// teacher's text blocks, so the fixture is all-teacher.
|
|
const chat = fixtureChat("coverage read", [
|
|
teacher("cov_t1", "tell me about coverage reads"),
|
|
teacher("cov_t2", "and about per-session blocks"),
|
|
teacher("cov_t3", "a third distinct message"),
|
|
].flat());
|
|
const empty = sessionCoverage(chat.id)!;
|
|
assert.ok(empty);
|
|
assert.equal(empty.totalMessages, 3);
|
|
assert.equal(empty.coveredCount, 0);
|
|
assert.equal(empty.uncoveredCount, 3);
|
|
assert.equal(empty.coveredTokens, 0);
|
|
assert.ok(empty.uncoveredTokens > 0);
|
|
assert.equal(empty.running, false);
|
|
assert.equal(empty.lastFoldedAt, null, "no fold yet");
|
|
|
|
// Fold the first two messages: the read derives the split + the
|
|
// newest fold timestamp from the ledger rows.
|
|
const slots = coverageSlots(chatStore.getChat(chat.id)!.messages);
|
|
graphStore.appendCoverage({ chatId: chat.id, fp: slots[0]!.fp, tokens: slots[0]!.tokens, foldedAt: "2026-09-24T10:00:00.000Z" });
|
|
graphStore.appendCoverage({ chatId: chat.id, fp: slots[1]!.fp, tokens: slots[1]!.tokens, foldedAt: "2026-09-24T11:30:00.000Z" });
|
|
// Another session's row must not leak into this read.
|
|
graphStore.appendCoverage({ chatId: "chat_other", fp: slots[2]!.fp, tokens: slots[2]!.tokens, foldedAt: "2026-09-24T23:00:00.000Z" });
|
|
|
|
const cov = sessionCoverage(chat.id)!;
|
|
assert.equal(cov.totalMessages, 3);
|
|
assert.equal(cov.coveredCount, 2);
|
|
assert.equal(cov.uncoveredCount, 1);
|
|
assert.equal(cov.coveredTokens, slots[0]!.tokens + slots[1]!.tokens);
|
|
assert.equal(cov.uncoveredTokens, slots[2]!.tokens);
|
|
assert.equal(cov.lastFoldedAt, "2026-09-24T11:30:00.000Z", "the NEWEST fold, and scoped to this session's rows");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("running: true only for THIS session's chat-kind run (the registry pin)", () => {
|
|
const chat = fixtureChat("coverage running", [user("cov_r1", "running pin")].flat());
|
|
const g = globalThis as { __lhExtractionRuns?: unknown };
|
|
const realRuns = g.__lhExtractionRuns;
|
|
try {
|
|
g.__lhExtractionRuns = {
|
|
running: new Map([
|
|
// a notes run for the same id is NOT this session's chat run
|
|
["src_notes", { chatId: "src_notes", kind: "notes", phase: "extracting", startedAt: 1, usage: {}, controller: new AbortController() }],
|
|
["other_chat", { chatId: "other_chat", kind: "chat", phase: "auditing", startedAt: 2, usage: {}, controller: new AbortController() }],
|
|
]),
|
|
inFlight: new Set(),
|
|
lastStartedAt: 0,
|
|
};
|
|
assert.equal(sessionCoverage(chat.id)!.running, false, "no chat-kind run for this id");
|
|
g.__lhExtractionRuns = {
|
|
running: new Map([
|
|
[chat.id, { chatId: chat.id, kind: "chat", phase: "extracting", startedAt: 3, usage: {}, controller: new AbortController() }],
|
|
]),
|
|
inFlight: new Set(),
|
|
lastStartedAt: 0,
|
|
};
|
|
assert.equal(sessionCoverage(chat.id)!.running, true);
|
|
} finally {
|
|
g.__lhExtractionRuns = realRuns;
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("unknown chat → null (the caller owns the 404)", () => {
|
|
assert.equal(sessionCoverage("chat_never_was"), null);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ─── deriveView (the rendering arc, owner 2026-09-30) ────────────────────────
|
|
|
|
describe("deriveView (the argument's geometry)", () => {
|
|
const prop = (id: string): GraphNode => ({
|
|
id,
|
|
name: id.toUpperCase(),
|
|
statement: `${id} statement`,
|
|
aliases: [],
|
|
createdAt: "2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z",
|
|
provenance: [],
|
|
});
|
|
const chain = (id: string, premises: string[], conclusion: string): GraphChain => ({
|
|
id,
|
|
premises,
|
|
conclusion,
|
|
provenance: [],
|
|
createdAt: "2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z",
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("a SINGLE-premise chain collapses to ONE direct arrow — no imp node", () => {
|
|
const view = deriveView({ nodes: [prop("a"), prop("b")], chains: [chain("arg_ab", ["a"], "b")] });
|
|
assert.deepEqual(view.nodes.map((n) => n.id), ["a", "b"], "no arg_ node minted");
|
|
assert.deepEqual(view.edges, [{ from: "a", to: "b" }], "the argument IS a plain arrow");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("a MULTI-premise chain keeps the imp node + fan (premises in, conclusion out)", () => {
|
|
const view = deriveView({
|
|
nodes: [prop("a"), prop("b"), prop("c")],
|
|
chains: [chain("arg_ab", ["a", "b"], "c")],
|
|
});
|
|
assert.deepEqual(view.nodes.map((n) => n.id).sort(), ["a", "arg_ab", "b", "c"]);
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
[...view.edges].sort((x, y) => (x.from < y.from ? -1 : x.from > y.from ? 1 : x.to < y.to ? -1 : 1)),
|
|
[
|
|
{ from: "a", to: "arg_ab" },
|
|
{ from: "arg_ab", to: "c" },
|
|
{ from: "b", to: "arg_ab" },
|
|
],
|
|
);
|
|
const imp = view.nodes.find((n) => n.id === "arg_ab")!;
|
|
assert.equal(imp.name, "\u27f9");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("two chains SHARING a conclusion stay distinct — two geometry points, never a unioned fan", () => {
|
|
const view = deriveView({
|
|
nodes: [prop("a"), prop("b"), prop("c"), prop("d"), prop("e")],
|
|
chains: [chain("arg_e1", ["a", "b"], "e"), chain("arg_e2", ["c", "d"], "e")],
|
|
});
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
view.nodes.map((n) => n.id).sort(),
|
|
["a", "arg_e1", "arg_e2", "b", "c", "d", "e"],
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(view.edges.some((x) => x.from === "arg_e1" && x.to === "e"));
|
|
assert.ok(view.edges.some((x) => x.from === "arg_e2" && x.to === "e"));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("dangling chains drop (missing member — the honest belt)", () => {
|
|
const view = deriveView({ nodes: [prop("a")], chains: [chain("arg_ghost", ["a"], "gone"), chain("arg_gone", ["ghost"], "a")] });
|
|
assert.deepEqual(view.nodes.map((n) => n.id), ["a"]);
|
|
assert.deepEqual(view.edges, []);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("LOGICAL edges: every chain contracts to direct premise→conclusion arrows (all chains, deduped)", () => {
|
|
const view = deriveView({
|
|
nodes: [prop("a"), prop("b"), prop("c")],
|
|
chains: [chain("arg_ab", ["a", "b"], "c"), chain("arg_ac", ["a"], "c")],
|
|
});
|
|
// arg_ab: a→c AND b→c; arg_ac: a→c again → deduped to one arrow.
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
[...view.logicalEdges].sort((x, y) => (x.from < y.from ? -1 : x.from > y.from ? 1 : x.to < y.to ? -1 : 1)),
|
|
[
|
|
{ from: "a", to: "c" },
|
|
{ from: "b", to: "c" },
|
|
],
|
|
);
|
|
// Proposition ids only — no arg_ endpoint ever rides the logical set.
|
|
assert.ok(view.logicalEdges.every((e) => !e.from.startsWith("arg_") && !e.to.startsWith("arg_")));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("impLinks: one linkage per MULTI-premise chain — the depth pass's midpoint input", () => {
|
|
const view = deriveView({
|
|
nodes: [prop("a"), prop("b"), prop("c")],
|
|
chains: [chain("arg_ab", ["a", "b"], "c"), chain("arg_ac", ["a"], "c")],
|
|
});
|
|
assert.deepEqual(view.impLinks, [{ id: "arg_ab", premises: ["a", "b"], conclusion: "c" }]);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|