Data analysis of the five-source corpus (490 nodes, 244 chains) found
three pathologies the goal-first core let through:
1. Narrative-adjacency chains — premises that occasioned rather than
entailed conclusions (concentrated in the polemical sources).
2. Session-scaffolding minted as knowledge — the source's own axiom
numbering (A1/F2/UT2), arc labels ('the crux') persisted as nodes.
3. Full-discourse volume — glossary and argument-arc material at equal
rank with load-bearing ideas (~200 nodes per source).
Three doctrine lines, same terse register as the core:
- entailment is the only link that earns a chain; historical/narrative
connections keep their pieces as bare propositions or drop them
- load-bearing ideas only (what a reference on the subject would teach)
- propositions must stand alone for a reader who never saw the source;
no leaning on the source's own scaffolding
Substring pins for all three; shared by session + notes extractors by
construction.
amosblomqvist
5ed724c224