Sycophancy mitigation as a structural commitment: the model writes its
full correctAnswer (plus explanation, in that order) BEFORE the learner
sees the question; the commitment rides the persisted call args, is
revealed on submit, and grades his free text in the model's next reply —
the client never grades free recall.
- tools.explain setting (segmented 'Quizzing — Multiple choice | Free
recall' in Agent settings' Tools group): free arms explain and drops
quiz for BOTH agents (prober variant carries no nodeId, same pattern
as the probe quiz); mechanics keys never pass filterEnabledTools —
quiz stays unwritable (the 2026-09-19 wedge ruling stands)
- doctrine lives pi-natively in the tool descriptions (owner ruling —
no conditional system-prompt chunks): explain carries the commitment
rule; the MC option-building craft moved out of the prompt into the
quiz description; shared/20-question-tools.md slims to the
quiz-agnostic core
- display seams: parseExplainInput (LaTeX-debris restoration included),
dock text-mode with an 'I don't know' row (kbd row 0), AnsweredCard
reveal (The answer / Why, no verdict chips), [Explain answer] format
- phases/plan seams recognize both quizzing tools' nodeId tags; explain
answers deliberately feed no ledger evidence (no client grading to
key on — a future ruling can parse the model's grade)
1049/1049 tests, typecheck/lint/build green.
amosblomqvist
2f39766528